CC_Minutes_2010_1213 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

275 Mr. Paschke reviewed Section 1004.02A and recent language revisions and included those 410 276 previous comments of the Commission as determined applicable. 277 Mr. Paschke encouraged submission by individual Commissioners of their comments for all 278 districts, preferably as soon as possible, for consideration in crafting language for the upcoming 279 chapters. 280 Chair Doherty noted the Comprehensive Plan guidance to bring retail buildings closer to the curb; 281 noting the disconnect in Roseville not being a large community of sidewalks; and questioned 282 whether this goal forces people to walk in the street and seemed inconsistent. 283 Mr. Paschke opined that this challenge was no different in the existing or proposed revised code, p p 284 that the option to require sidewalks and/or pathways was available but needed review on an 285 individual, site -by -site basis to achieve the more pedestrian friendly environment, while not 286 creating safety issues. Mr. Paschke noted that these goals would not be achieved overnight, but 287 as with the existing code, would be a work in progress and be achieved through flexibility with 288 new development and/or redevelopment efforts. 289 Members and staff briefly discussed the upcoming joint meeting between the Commission and City 290 Council scheduled for Monday, May 10, 2010. 291 Extract from the June 2, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 292 PROJECT FILE 0017 293 a. Request by Planning Division of the City of Roseville to adopt a new Official Zoning Map, 294 effectively rezoning all properties within the City to be consistent with the Roseville 2030 295 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations 296 Chair Doherty opened the Public Hearing for PROJECT FILE 0017 at 6:40 p.m. 297 City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed staffs analysis of this request and recommended 298 approval of the rezoning of the City of Roseville as provided on the DRAFT OFFICIAL 299 ROSEVILLE ZONING MAP, as detailed in the Request for Planning Commission Action dated 300 June 2, 2010. Mr. Paschke advised that this request was as a requirement of the City of Roseville 301 amending its Comprehensive Plan Land Use section, and all zoning designations within the 302 City needing to be rezoned consistent with those stated land use designations. Mr. Paschke 303 advised that with the exception of amendments made over the years, the City's previous zoning 304 code had been adopted in 1959. 305 Mr. Paschke reviewed the proposed zoning districts, with efforts made to simplify and 306 consolidate the current number of districts, with each district designation renamed to avoid 307 confusion. Mr. Paschke further reviewed the numerous public informational meetings held to- 308 date for public comment. Mr. Paschke advised that staff had compiled approximately sixty-seven 309 (67) anomaly properties that will require further consideration of Comprehensive Plan land Use 310 amendments before rezoning, and that those properties would be addressed at a later date.