My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6853
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6800
>
res_6853
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:12:16 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:00:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6853
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. ST-P-79-12 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
7/23/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8 <br /> <br />blue storm sewer which we must put in because the county is <br />up-grading Lexington Avenue. So therefore, the price you're <br />talking about - the $295 - that's already charged to you. I think <br />the thing that the Council has to decide now is do they want to <br />pay in this fund extra money to put in the sections that are <br />shown in red. We can put in the sections that are shown in red <br />and you won't be charged any more money. You're already going to <br />be charged the amount because of the fact that we have to put <br />in the blue line. <br /> <br />Now, if we leave the red line out - this is the little <br />short section - that possibly we could do, and if we leave the red <br />line out on the top we cannot fix that road. We leave that off <br />at County Road C-2 - we cannot fix that road with MSA funds, <br />which again we can do with your money - the MSA fund is your money. <br />Don't get the idea it's a gift from anybody. If you look at the price <br />of gasoline on that little pump you get that out of, there's a <br />lot going back in here, but it's a matter of timing. <br /> <br />I think with the inflation now we'd be better to put that <br />red section of storm sewer in now and pay maybe 10 percent less <br />than we would two years from now - maybe pay 25 percent less than <br />five years from now, and like Charlie said, I think this is <br />probably the time we should do it. In the process of putting that <br />in we can up-grade County Road C-2 without charging anybody any <br />money. You ask for Churchill or Oxford - that has to be you. We <br />had a public hearing about two and a half years ago and the people <br />decided they did not want any permanent roads in Roseville, so <br />if you feel you want a permanent road you have to petition for it. <br />We will take care of any petitions, but the money situation cost <br />to you on this project is all taken care of by what has to be done <br />on Lexington Avenue. The other part we would be doing, in my <br />opinion because it's the most expedient time to do it. We can <br />put it in - not have to charge you any money for it on assess- <br />ments. We do use up some of our MSA funds to put in a section <br />of road on County Road C-2, and I've been on that section and I <br />don't think it's too darn good the way it is. So personally, I'm <br />going to vote in favor of the project. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I might point out that Mr. Anderson is referring <br />to lO percent less than next year - referring to inflation. However, <br />if this is built - and speaking strictly of the storm sewer on <br />County Road C-2 - along with the (inaudible) it comes cheaper <br />to bring in the equipment at the same time. The same way with <br />paving the road in conjunction with others. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: County Road C-2 won't be up-graded <br />unless we put a storm sewer in. Nobody wants to spend $295, and <br />that doesn't come easy to everybody, but in order to get that <br />street in with MSA funds I think we're going to have to put the <br />storm sewer in the red area and it seems like $295 over 20 years <br /> <br />(inaudible) are going to be driving over that street and I think <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.