2004_1220_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Planner has not completed the anchor tenant building use review and parlang determinations. 6, l�r Year 2001 average daily traffic (ADT) along County Road B2 at Rosedale Center was 20,000. It is anticipated that traffic will increase to 20,500 ADT by 2010 and to 25,000 ADT by 2020 (Source: Roseville Comprehensive Plan — Section 5, Ramsey County Transportation Plan). O'THER IN�ACTS: �,1 � Site lighting within the reconstructed parking lots, the plaza, and on the building has not been provided. However, it is assumed that a proposal will meet the requirements of Section 1010 of the City Code. Specifically, the lights must be downcast and not shed glare at adjacent properties. �-1 � The placement of inechanical equipment can create visual and noise issues. It is assumed that air conditioning units will be on the roof of the structures. Roof mounted units must be "reasonably" screened from view at adjacent properiy lines. Staff interprets "reasonably" as allowing roof top mechanical to be partially seen (requires painting and strategic placement) from property line where structures are hundreds of feet from properiy lines and the site includes varying elevation changes, such as proposed site within Rosedale Center. �- t`� Should an emergency generator be contemplated, the final site plans must indicate the proposed location and security, and the generator must meet all applicable State decibel levels. '�,� STAFF RECOMMENDATION: �_ 1 The proposed uses are consistent with a regional mall. Staff recommends approval of the AMENDED PLANNED iTNIT DEVELOPMENT — GENERAL CONCEPT for Jones Lang LaSalle to allow a 132,679 sq. ft easterly addition on to the Mall, and new renovations of the Mervyn's site (converting from anchor store to multiple retail shops) with exterior entrances, subject to 11 conditions stipulated in the project report dated December 20, 2004. #�,� PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: �, I On December l, 2004, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Rosedale expansion. At the meeting no citizens addressed the Commission, however, Commissioners did have questions of the applicant and City Staff. $�� Specifically, the Commission expressed concerns over traffic, parking, and the need for continued transit service and park-in-ride capabilities at Rosedale (see attached minutes). PF3608_RCA_GeneralConcept_122004 Page 7 of 20