2009_HRC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Human Rights Commission Meeting Minutes – April 14, 2009 Page 3 of 7 Chair Singleton clarified that th e proposed ordinance language was not attempting to change the HRC’s name or eliminate its responsibility for hu man rights; but to add to or expand the HRC’s purpose, and sought consen sus among Commissioners. Commissioner Oftelie expressed concern with how ge neral the program statement was (Section 204.05 Duties, F.3), and whether more definition was needed related to programs. Commissioner McKenzie requested that previous document be provided to new Commissioners to ensure that the HRC was not replaced by a Neighborhood and Divers ity Commission, and if that was the intent that it be a separate body. Commissioner McKe nzie said she was not against reinvigorating the HRC and adding to its role; however, she expressed concern that the HRC would become the body to plan and carry out comm unity cultural festivals and lose sight of their original purpose. Discussion included identifying the proposed changes; clarification of the proposed expansion of the HRC; interpretation of diversity as a va luable asset for the community; perceived and invisibility of portions of the community; need to remove fear in the community and treat all equally; community values and their relationship to the role and purpose of the HRC; how to engage the 73% of the community to treat all fairly and equitably a nd correct or improve understandings; and comparative end goals and implementation. Commissioner Grefenberg spoke in support of br oadening and expanding the role of the HRC; however, he concurred with Comm issioner McKenzie that the orig inal role and intent of the HRC should remain a watchdog for huma n rights issues and situations. Chair Singleton clarified that the proposed broadening would not minimize the human rights purpose of the HRC. Discussion included the value of cu ltural festivals as a first step in welcoming diversity groups within the community and to promote growth; partnership opportunitie s to promote the HRC mission and focus; and a review of proposed language changes in the Ordinance. Ordinance and HRC objectives were elaborated upon; specific languag e was debated with Commissioners agreeing that human rights was not proposed to be eliminated but that diversity was under the human rights umbrella. Commissioner Kennedy offered to send a copy of the Roseville Area School District’s inclusionary document to Ms. Cu rti to distribute to the HRC. Motion - Member Oftelie moved, seconded by Member Kennedy to recommend to the City Council retention of th e “Human Rights Commission;” and to not change or expand upon the name. Motion carried: 7/0/0. Further discussion related to the HRC Purpose Statement.