Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville Human Rights Commission <br />Meeting Minutes – September 08, 2009 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />including meeting struct ure, should future meetings be te levised, including public comment and <br />development of more effective meeting agenda s as the HRC sought to reach out into the <br />community; and ensuring that the HRC achieve their goals. <br /> <br />Some members referenced a work plan develope d in 2003 and asked Ms. Curti to provide a copy <br />of that document. <br /> <br />Discussion included how the facilitator could take the HRC Strategic Plan a nd assist in achieving <br />those efforts; value of a workshop exclusively for this discussion; how to develop an action plan <br />and measure goals through timelin es and delegating res ponsibilities; and adva ntages in future <br />grant applications to show the proactive efforts of the HRC. <br /> <br />Member Grefenberg expressed his interest in getting to know HRC members and their <br />philosophies and interests, rather than devoti ng time to effective meeting management, while <br />recognizing the need of an effec tive order for meeting business. <br /> <br />Chair Singleton noted his rationale in suggestin g a more simplistic alternative for meeting <br />management (i.e., Robert Rules) for the be nefit of commissioner s needing additional <br />information. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Oftelie expressed inte rest, and lack of previous training, in meeting operating <br />procedures and rules. <br /> <br />Member Jaeger moved, seconded by Member Yate s, approval of Global Synergy Group, and Mr. <br />Richard Fursman as the facilitator for the wo rkshop, using grant funds from the Minnesota <br />Department of Human Rights Bremer Foundation Grant, as recently awarded. <br /> <br />Member Kennedy offered a friendly amendment that the HRC expected that the session would <br />result in a viable HRC work plan as a product. The makers of the motion accepted the friendly <br />amendment, and included it as a part of their motion. <br /> <br />Member Grefenberg spoke in support of the moti on, as amended; and expressed his interest in <br />the facilitator seeking involvement and comment from each commissioner prior to the workshop. <br /> <br />Motion carried: all Ayes: 7/0. <br /> <br />V. Consider whether to apply for another MN Department of Human Rights Grant – <br />Deadline September 30, 2009. <br />Ms. Curti sought interest of members in making application to the Minn esota Department of <br />Human Rights for the next grant cycle, with a deadline of September 30, 2009, for application to <br />funds up to $1,500 to develop a local commission ’s capacity building project or implement a <br />civic engagement project; antici pating that funding would be used for the third annual, 2010 <br />community forum. Ms. Curti said she talk ed with MN HRC Grant Coordinator, Mario <br />Hernandez, and he felt that the HRC would be elig ible for funding, given his familiarity with last <br />year’s forum.