2010-06-02_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, June 02, 2010 Page 16 Commissioner Boerigter opined that the Enzler parcel didn’t make sense as Low 765 Density Residential; noting that much of the past objection to higher density was 766 related to the specific Orchard proposals and/or developers. Commissioner 767 Boerigter noted that the recommendations of the Commission still required a 768 super majority vote of the City Council, and would provide for additional 769 discussion. 770 Ayes: 6 771 Nays: 1 (Gisselquist) 772 Motion carried. 773 Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Doherty to RECOMMEND 774 APPROVAL of the AMENDMENT TO THE OFFICIAL ROSEVILLE ZONING 775 MAP dated May 2010, rezoning all property in Roseville as proposed and as 776 detailed in the Request for Planning Commission Action dated June 2, 777 2010; with the exception of those two (2) previously-identified areas, 778 inclusive of three (3) parcels addressed in the previous motion. 779 Ayes: 7 780 Nays: 0 781 Motion carried. 782 For the public’s information, Mr. Paschke advised that no specific date had been 783 set for this item to be heard by the City Council, but anticipated that it would be 784 end of June or first part of July; with the docket listing it as a Zoning Map 785 Amendment for discussion purposes only, not for action at that first meeting; 786 action would be deferred until all Zoning Districts on the map had gone through 787 their respective process and been ratified. 788 b. PROJECT FILE 0017 789 Request by the Roseville Planning Division Adopting new regulations for 790 Title 10, Zoning Regulations, pertaining to the RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS 791 Chair Doherty noted the lateness of the hour, and recommended that this item be 792 continued to a future meeting to allow for timely hearing of public comment and 793 sufficient and lucid discussion by Commissioners. However, since there were 794 citizens in the audience prepared to speak tonight, the Chair proposed that those 795 citizens be heard at this time, with Commissioners concurring with both 796 recommendations of the Chair. 797 Commissioner Boerigter suggested that citizens provide their comments and/or 798 concerns in writing to staff for forwarding to the Commission prior to the July 799 meeting, allowing a better understanding of the various issues consisting of 800 technical points. 801 Chair Doherty concurred with that suggestion. 802 Chair Doherty opened the Public Hearing for PROJECT FILE 0017 at 10:25 p.m. 803 Prior to taking public comment and at the request of Chair Doherty, City Planner 804 Thomas Paschke briefly reviewed this request and recommended approval of the 805 proposed new text for all Residential Districts in the City of Roseville, adopting 806 new regulations for Title 10, Zoning Regulations, pertaining to all RESIDENTIAL 807 DISTRICTS, as detailed in the Request for Planning Commission Action dated 808 June 2, 2010. 809 Public Comment 810 Jody Ward-Rannow, 1141 Sexton Avenue W 811 Ms. Ward-Rannow expressed concern with potential revisions for garage 812 setbacks from current code. Ms. Ward Rannow advised that their family was in 813 the process of pursuing a garage addition utilizing a current breezeway and one- 814 car garage, and providing an additional bedroom behind the garage, but requiring 815