My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6930
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6900
>
res_6930
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:12:45 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:02:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6930
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-79-20 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
3/10/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />l2 <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: There's asphalt there. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: If we thought he shouldn't be assessed <br />for all that, we could take care of it at the assessment hearing. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Anyone else wish to speak on this project? <br /> <br />MR. JEFF NOTTO, 1839 Western Avenue: I'm the mystery <br />property owner. Rather than confuse everybody any more, I might <br />just mention that I had a purchase agreement that dated back <br />two years for the south half of 21, 22 and 23, but because of <br />some title problem which took two years to close up, we didn't <br />close until two weeks ago. The next day I received a notice <br />of this hearing. We also own the north half of 2l, 22 and 23, <br />and also it's Lot 24 which is our present home site that's <br />kind of "L" shaped up above, and at the time we purchased this <br />property, the sellers had it divided into two separate home , <br />sites - the northern and southern, which is everything of 2l, 22, <br />and 23 except the north 67 l/2 feet which makes that lower <br />part of 21, 22 and 23 a buildable lot. It was my understanding <br />that we have water on LOt 23 - on the south half of 23, is that <br />correct or not? According to the way this looks, it looks like <br />the water and sewer would come in on the south end of that property <br />but it was my understanding there is water somewhere on the south <br />half of 23 that extends out to Western. <br /> <br />MR. WIDERSKI: As far as I know, the water goes by and it <br />does go to Flipp which is on this side of Western where that <br />red line is - that goes to her house - the water, so it goes as <br />far as her house. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: What I'm not sure of is if there's a water <br />service. That used to be one large lot and I could be wrong, but I <br />think there was a single service built to serve that one large <br />lot and that's being used by the house, so in order to get water <br />we have to build another service from some watermain. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Where does sanitary sewer go to? <br /> <br />MR. STRONG: To this point. <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: We cannot bring the sewer down Western. <br />It has to come through - <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: You have an elevation problem. You wouldn't <br />be able to get full service out of the (inaudible). <br /> <br />MR. STRONG: This house can't be hooked up. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: The land is too low for that sewer that's <br />existing on Western: <br /> <br />MR. NOTTO: We would like to have the sewer and water on the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.