Laserfiche WebLink
Special City Council Work Plan Meeting 1 <br /> Monday,January 31,2011 <br /> Page 8 <br /> Mayor Roe observed that, given the current condition of Station #1, it would <br /> probably be prudent to not have any programs or community activities operating <br /> from that facility. <br /> Recess <br /> Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 7:59 p.m. and reconvened at approximately <br /> 8:08 p.m. <br /> e. Finance Department—Finance Director Chris Miller <br /> Finance Director Chris Miller reviewed the Department's "Must Do's" and <br /> "Ought To Do's" in 2011, including mandated and regularly scheduled activities <br /> or those already in process. Mr. Miller elaborated on those items provided in <br /> staffs written discussion outline, emphasizing the need to seriously address the <br /> City's long-term financial sustainability. <br /> Mr. Miller reviewed the changes made to the budget process in an attempt to pro- <br /> vide added transparency, with that work continuing as staff channeled resources <br /> to reflect the City Council's priorities and away from those deemed as having less <br /> corporate value; dedication of new moneys to eliminate funding gaps in asset re- <br /> placement programs and the millions of dollars the City continued to be behind in <br /> funding asset replacements, opining that every year's delay only serves to exacer- <br /> bate that problem, with the exception of the successful PMP program created by <br /> previous City Councils. Mr. Miller noted that the last 8 out of 11 years, City <br /> Councils had tapped into its reserves to plug operating gaps, and strongly encour- <br /> aged Councilmembers to discontinue that practice, while recognizing the reluc- <br /> tance of the public in increased taxes, and the political issues faced by the City <br /> Council. <br /> Mr. Miller specifically addressed the City's current and projected Information <br /> Technology (IT) services and the need to effectively manage it for the future <br /> through investing in cost-saving equipment. <br /> Discussion among Councilmembers and staff included the need to update the fi- <br /> nancial savings projections from the 2005/06 study for the entire campus on geo- <br /> thermal energy and related annual budget impacts; and use of reserve funds or as- <br /> set management funds for IT services similar to the IMP or PIP as needs over the <br /> next five years were projected, with current funds primarily from tower rents and <br /> Joint Powers Agreements (JPA's) for IT services with other communities and/or <br /> agencies, with increases built into those contracts. <br /> Mayor Roe noted the need to tie in geothermal energy factors short- and long- <br /> term and impacts to the annual budget, and as part of CIP projections. <br /> Councilmember Johnson concurred, noting that the same projections were indi- <br /> cated for the City's IT investments. <br />