res_7043 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4 of saying people won't be able to use the alley. I agree there is a definite drop-off and these people, particularly the first gentleman, are getting their service and access from other roads. MR. MC DONOUGH: Are you going to put a barrier there too? MR. HONCHELL: We were not proposing to do that on Lot 12, but would consider it. }lR. MC DONOUGH: That would make it more useless. MR. HONCHELL: We're concerned about safety. MR. STRONG: Lot 12 is 80.08 feet. MR. HONCHELL: So it's approximately 80 feet times $2.50. MAYOR DEMOS: More like a little under $200. Are you facing Glenwood then? MR. RATNASWAMY: Yes. I have a pie-shaped lot - number 13. MR. HONCHELL: This hearing is not to determine who gets assessed how much. MAYOR DEMOS: The assessment hearings occur in the year after the work is completed. Would that be 1981 for this? And if you feel you have no benefit, you can again make that plea at that point and this will all be looked at in that period of time. Anyone else that wishes to be heard about this? MRS. MARY K. HALE, 401 Woodruff Avenue: I never use the alley. I have lived there 32 years and I have no reason to use it and I don't feel I should be assessed for it and if they're going to widen the alley there's a slope on my side and I wonder if they're going to cut back into the hill and somehow~here will be a drop there and the soil will erode on to the road if it isn't held back somehow. MR. HONCHELL: The proposed width, if you look on both north/south Qegs, is supposed to be 12 feet of improvement. That's approximately what is there now. We feel we could do this with fairly minimal impact into the side slopes. MRS. HALE How does that assessment work? Is it front footage or side? I'm on the side where the long alley is, plus the front. How would that work? MR. STRONG: That's 50 feet. MRS. HALE: It's just the front footage. MR. STRONG: It's back here, and 12 feet of the long side so it's actually 62.5 feet.