My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-10-28_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
2010-10-28_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2011 12:09:15 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 12:08:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/28/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Von De Linde moved, Member Eckman seconded scheduling a Special Meeting of the <br />GLWMO on Wednesday, November 10, 2010 at 5:30 p.m. at the Roseville City Hall, in aroom <br />to be determined if the Hawthorne Room was unavailable, for the single purpose of interviewing <br />the firm of EOR for development of the Third Generation 509 Plan. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />After further deliberation, Chair Ferrington moved, Member Manzara seconded scheduling a <br />Special Meeting to address final 2010 business items of the GLWMO on Tuesday, November 30, <br />2010 at 5:30 p.m., at a location yet to be determined as room reservations are finalized. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Coordinate next steps for input /discussion/selection with Shoreview and Roseville <br />Mr. Maloney and Mr. Schwartz agreed to submit their questions for consideration of the Board <br />prior to the interview of EOR. <br />Mr. Maloney opined that, from his perspective, the two finalist firms had been generally <br />responsive to the Board's RFP, exclusive of stylistic differences as he previously noted. Mr. <br />Maloney suggested that if the Board could be firm about the expectations of the firm(s) and their <br />expectations of city staff for supporting documentation, local plans, data, and maps, to the <br />greatest extent that could be articulated by the firm, it would be of great assistance for staff in <br />providing that information in a timely way. Mr. Maloney advised that his main question for the <br />EOR proposal was to clearly understand each respective city's role in development and <br />implementation of the plan. <br />Mr. Schwartz asked that the firm(s) be asked to clarify goals, policies and regulatory <br />expectations of watershed districts for the cities, noting that in Roseville, preference was given to <br />see some level of consistency for storm water management, volume and infiltration across <br />watershed districts, further noting that they were part of the Capitol Region Watershed District <br />and Rice Creek Watershed District. <br />Chair Ferrington confirmed that with two watershed districts and the GLWMO having <br />responsibility for portions of Roseville, and with one watershed district and GLWMO in <br />Shoreview, such consistency was definitely an important component. <br />New Business <br />Review /Payment of Invoices <br />Mr. Peterson revised the invoice list for tonight's meeting by removing Item 4 identified as <br />Administrative Services for RCD from July 1, 2010 to October 22, 2010; and advised that he was <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.