My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7074
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7000
>
res_7074
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:38 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:05:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7074
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-80-27 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
11/17/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7 <br /> <br />Even now the people who said about water being on County Road B, I <br />used to visit at the Golden Age Nursing Home and in the spring <br />when there was a run off and the drains were frozen that <br />water (inaudible) not run off and you're going to find that <br />anyway in that area. <br /> <br />I heard about them swimming at Har Mar and that was when we <br />had four inches of rain within an hour. <br /> <br />Anyway, back in 1954 is when Ed Wilmus had a road grader <br />and he had bought property from Mr. Harold which is the property <br />from Hamline to Pascal between County Road B and Burke. He <br />bought property and he put in half a street so he could sell <br />lots. He did the same thing on Eldridge. <br /> <br />Now, my father put in his half a street on Burke in about <br />1954 and at that time it was just the way streets were made at <br />that time and nothing has really been done since then. It was <br />just gravel and tar, not even blacktop. <br /> <br />When my father came to building homes on Eldridge we were <br />already a village, but Roseville had a code by which streets were <br />to be built and, too bad my father isn't living today because <br />I think we'd have to carry both my father and brother out if <br />they heard what he said about Eldridge. They said that half a <br />street was built to the Roseville specifications and my father <br />and brother argued with the Council and Mayor McGee that it was not. <br />They said it was. My father lost out so he had some put in the <br />north half of Eldridge from Hamline to Pascal to their <br />specifications. He had to pay for the storm sewer which now <br />exists and the street which now exists and it was engineered <br />by the Roseville engineer. This was to be the beginning of the <br />first permanent street program in Roseville. <br /> <br />My father put the water and sewer stubs in all the way up on <br />all 12 lots in the first plat and (inaudible) four lots. It <br />all went the whole street so that street would never have to be <br />torn into each time a house was built to disturb a permanent <br />street. <br /> <br />In 1976 when you had the street program you did not list <br />it as a permanent street so I checked with Mr. Honchell to find <br />out why. Roseville was out and we took samples. St. Paul <br />Testing Lab was out and took samples. (Inaudible) I have a map <br />from the people who took the samples, the addresses where they <br />were taken. I have a let~r in writing from Mr. Honchell <br />saying that according to the testing at the testing lab that it <br />qualified for capacity of a 7-ton street. It does say there is <br />some variance between both sides of the street, but what no one <br />says is that after my father had his half a street put in, <br />Rosevil1e again had to to and built the other side of Burke <br />over an inch and some of the residents who live on that street <br />say that's the only thing they (inaudible) I was told that <br />Roseville has no records of this street in 1976. I think you <br />need to hire me to keep records for you. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.