My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7074
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7000
>
res_7074
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:38 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:05:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7074
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-80-27 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
11/17/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8 <br /> <br />(Inaudible) it was discovered by him from the books in <br />Roseville, and I would like to have the Council make note of <br />this, that my father, after paying for the street and the <br />storm sewer to Orfei and Sons, Inc., and the date of the bill <br />is November 15, 1963, he signed a quit claim deed to Roseville <br />and it's recorded in the Roseville Book 1839, page 210, and this <br />was given to Chuck (inaudible) by Doug Strong of the Roseville <br />Engineering Department. <br /> <br />Now, they were out taking samples again and I went out and <br />when I saw them drilling, and ~x. Honchell was there, and he <br />said they were re-drilling again because they did not have the <br />addresses of where they took those samples in 1976. So I went <br />to my file and was there in a short time and I have <br />signed here by the people who were taking the samples (inaudible) <br />and they took on both sides of the street and Mr. Honchell said <br />they were taking them now because they wanted to find out what <br />it was in the middle of the street. <br /> <br />Now, this street was engineered by Roseville. The storm <br />sewer was engineered by Rosevil1e. This then is the fault of <br />Roseville and I cannot see where the cost of this street and <br />storm sewer was pro rated over the cost included in the sale of <br />these lots to the people on the north side in the Zibell Addition <br />that they should now have to be paving again for a goof made by <br />the City of Roseivlle. <br /> <br />Another thing, it will be three years ago on the 31st of <br />December that the watermain broke just down the hill from <br />Hamline and they were out there all day to fix it. They went <br />and put some tar on the top of it and they have never done any- <br />thing since. It's just one big bump. All the bumps are from <br />some work they have done somewhere along the line, but never <br />done a good job of going over it. <br /> <br />That street is a good street compared to Burke and Belmont <br />Lane because I know how those other streets were put in and <br />if I sent you a copy (inaudible) You said you had no records <br />so I sent you a copy of all the material that went into <br />Eldridge and I think the Council should study these things and <br />see what happened and I would like to have you go back to your <br />records when that street went in. This same thing is going to <br />happen another 20 years from now. That street was only put in in <br />1963 as a permanent street. Somebody was pulling the wool over <br />somebody's eyes, but I feel that that street has not had more <br />than one - at least not more than two - overcoats or sealers <br />(inaudible) . <br /> <br />I think they have cleaned the basins out on that once and <br />if those storm sewers aren't big enough that's not the <br />fault of the people on the street or the developer. It's the <br />fault of the engineers of Rosevil1e and I think that belongs to <br />Roseville to pay. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Do you want a response? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.