2011-01-20_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

687 688 Member Eckman noted her perception that there could be significant additional costs for 689 improvement versus maintaining. Member Eckman noted the need to recognize culture change 690 and encouraging people in their responsibility to protect water bodies and to provide a 691 sustainability definition in the framework for future generations. 692 693 Chair Ferrington noted the need for differences in management based on specific conditions of a 694 water body, indicating that there may be those with current water quality appropriate for 695 maintenance and those more appropriate to manage for improvement of water quality into the 696 future; and how each element of a Mission statement may apply or not apply to a specific body 697 of water. 698 699 Member Manzara opined that restoration was really subjective; questioning at which point in 700 time a water body should be restored to; further opining that it was only as meaningful as your 701 action. 702 703 Ms. Correll advised that she would take tonight's discussion, and the submission of individual 704 words from Board Members to define and draft a Mission and Vision that could be further 705 developed for floating at the first stakeholder meeting. 706 707 Next Steps 708 Ms. Correll asked that the Board set a date for the first stakeholder meeting, anticipating that the 709 meeting would be held in Open House format from 3 :30 6:30 p.m allowing Board members to 710 interface with those individuals and agencies attending. 711 712 Member Westerberg advised that he anticipated being out of town the entire month of January. 713 714 Ms. Correll advised that she would arrange to meet with Members Westerberg and Manzara 715 prior to his leaving town to discuss water quality data. 716 717 Discussion included location logistics; commitment of Board members and their availability to 718 attend all meetings for the duration of 2011; EOR goals for the first stakeholder meeting; review 719 by EOR of as much data as possible related to each water body, summaries of existing data and 720 discussion of outlet structures, quality of existing resources, and discussion with Member 721 Westerberg of the Barr Report; and subsequent stakeholder meetings. 722 723 Member Manzara suggested that if the first stakeholder meeting was held in Roseville, the 724 second one be held in Shoreview. 725 726 Ms. Bloom and Mr. Maloney advised that the sooner the next meeting date was available the 727 better in planning logistics and meeting room reservations. 728 729 Ms. Correll suggested that the second stakeholder meeting be held approximately three weeks 730 from the first meeting; and the third meeting held the first part of March; and coordinated with 731 upcoming GLWMO Board meeting dates as well for planning purposes. 732 16