Laserfiche WebLink
93 2011 Meeting Schedule <br />94 Discussion ensued regarding individual schedules of members and representatives from member <br />95 cities and availability of dates; consistency of meeting dates and times; preferred role of city staff <br />96 representatives from both Roseville and Shoreview to maintain communication during <br />97 development of the 3' Generation 10 Year Plan, and for policy and implementation of the plan <br />98 by cities; and the dramatic evolution of WMO administration and interaction with cities over the <br />99 years since the GLWMO's inception. <br />100 <br />101 By consensus, members and city staff representatives concurred that the third Thursday of each <br />102 month at 5:00 p.m. was the preferred date and time for 2011 meetings. <br />103 <br />104 Members requested that Ms. Bloom review the availability of meeting rooms for a two -hour <br />105 block starting in January of 2011 to determine if there were any scheduling conflicts. <br />106 <br />107 Mr. Maloney noted that if the City of Roseville had meeting room conflicts, Shoreview facilities <br />108 may be available as needed. <br />109 <br />110 Member Manzara moved, and Member Eckman seconded approval 2011 meetings on the third <br />111 Thursday of each month at 5:00 p.m. <br />112 <br />113 Ayes: 5 <br />114 Nays: 0 <br />115 Motion carried <br />116 <br />117 Treasurer's Report <br />118 Chair Ferrington advised that this was only an update, and not an action item, as the 2010 <br />119 Treasurer's Annual Report was pending and would be brought forward in the near future. <br />120 <br />121 Mr. Petersen reviewed the GLWMO Treasurer's Statement for the Period ending November 30, <br />122 2010 (version 12.10/10); and Budget Details (version 12/10/10); highlighting expenditures since <br />123 the last Treasurer's report; noting that the bulk of funds remaining in the General Expense <br />124 Budget will be utilized by year -end. <br />125 <br />126 Mr. Petersen reviewed the Non Encumbered Fund Balance; remaining projects and general <br />127 expenses anticipated before year -end; and carryover for 2011 in addition to 2011 budget <br />128 revenues from the Cities of Shoreview and Roseville. <br />129 <br />130 Members concurred that they would like to have additional detail for the 2011 Budget indicating <br />131 how the totals had been derived. <br />132 <br />133 Chair Ferrington asked that the spreadsheets include formulas guiding and demonstrating how <br />134 money was moved around from one reporting period to the next. <br />135 <br />136 Mr. Petersen advised that this could be done for future reports. <br />137 <br />3 <br />