My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7078
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7000
>
res_7078
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:40 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:05:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7078
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-80-23 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
11/20/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7 <br /> <br />and the people said "no way". <br /> <br />MR. MOHL: We didn't even know a petition was being circulated, <br />or had been. I talked to Mr. Colby and he was the one that started <br />it and he didn't even come and tell me when they were sampling the <br />soil on the street that he had anything to do with it and that's the <br />thing that irritates me. It's an undercover deal.I'm giving you <br />our opinion. It's small town stuff. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: We can't do anything about that. <br /> <br />MR. THOMAS MARTIN, 2981 Patton Road: As far as small town <br />politics or undercover, one day some neighbors were talking we'd <br />like to get our road repaved. A few years ago the cost was $7.77 <br />and there was such a stink so I guess the minorities came down <br />and - or the people that didn't want it apparently were in the minority <br />and they raised all the heck, so last summer we were talking and we <br />got a petition. Out of 14 houses, lO signed, two weren't home that <br />day, and two wouldn't sign. We sent it in. It was just a one-day <br />petition. We didn't petition Millwood or Stanbridge or Manson. I <br />don't feel we should petition someone else that doesn't live on our <br />block. There's nothing underhanded about it. If the majority of the <br />people donlt want it that's fine, but if the majority do, that's <br />what the hearing is for. <br /> <br />MR. MOHL: But it happens we're on Patton Road and we didn't get <br />the petition. We have more space on Patton than any other lot on the <br />street. There's just no sense to it. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Anyone else? <br /> <br />MR. ALBERT JACKSON, 2959 Patton Road: I did not know about the <br />petition. I did not know about it until I got the notice in the mail. <br />I feel like this other gentleman - 'to single out one block is just a <br />waste of money.I think if the area were to be improved that might <br />be another story. <br /> <br />Another thing just occurred to me. I heard the project where <br />they are not going to excavate any of the present street, so what are <br />we going to do - have a big bump? No, it just doesn't make sense. I <br />think that the City Council is remiss in their duties if they allow <br />just a small area like this to have such a large expenditure of <br />money for no purpose at all. <br /> <br />11AYOR DEMOS: We do have streets throughout the City and I don't <br />think we have bumps like that. I think they have been worked into <br />the next street. <br /> <br />MR. JACKSON: It just seems to me it accomplishes nothing. The <br />letter says that it would help better drainage and snow plowing. <br />What good is one block going to do in an area where there's several <br />other streets involved? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: It helps the people who live there. <br /> <br />MR. JACKSON: There's no problem with the street right now. <br />It's fine as it is. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.