My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7078
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7000
>
res_7078
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:40 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:05:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7078
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-80-23 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
11/20/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />9 <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: lO%, up to l50 feet, so that would be thirteen <br />and a half feet. We haven't arbitrarily changed our policy from <br />year to year. It used to be you did pay for corner lots, and <br />three or four years ago we did cut it down. <br /> <br />MR. KETELSEN: So you're planning to stay with 10%. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Yes. <br /> <br />MR. KETELSEN: I guess lastly, neither my wife or I would say <br />this would not be an improvement in terms of the looks of the <br />block. We're a little hesitant in that we wish more was included <br />in it, like a group of streets. I find it difficult to believe <br />it would not be more cost effective to do more than one street at a <br />time. I also find it difficult (inaudible) petroleum base as <br />asphalt does not increase in price, and interest rates. It would <br />be extremely difficult to say that interest rates would not be <br />much higher. They could be lower, granted. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: Are you for the project? <br /> <br />MR. KETELSEN: I would like the looks. However, in terms of <br />cost and the cost to me, I would say, no. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: You would like to have more participation <br />of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />MR. KETELSEN: Yes. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: (Inaudible) because when Mr. Popovich ran <br />off the cost it was $49.08 a foot, so if this weren't available <br />to you it would cost $49.08 a foot to build this street. We're <br />offering it to you at $l2.27 a foot, so obviously there is a lot <br />of cooperation among the nei~hborhood because we're helping to pay <br />the other 75% - the other taxpayers in Roseville. <br /> <br />MR. KETELSEN: I realize that. I guess what I'm saying, I <br />would believe that if we could do Patton, Stanbridge and Millwood <br />as a group it would be better and more cost effective than just <br />to do a block at a time. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: We can't do that unless we had the people <br />on Stanbridge ask for an improvement. <br /> <br />~~. KETELSEN: I was just wondering, would it be so difficult <br />to require a petitioning group that while the petition for a road <br />affects those involved, the imraediately adjacent streets be notified <br />of the existence of a petition. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: In the hearings of 1976,and I'm not about to <br />(inaudible). I said we would live with the situation and any <br />street we built from that point on would be one that was requested <br />by the people, unless it was an MSA road, which means the state <br />gasoline and license plate tax pay for that street entirely. <br />In other words, I'm not about to subject these people (inaudible). <br />We have suggested, and have a little hand-out thatdoes (inaudible) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.