Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3 <br /> <br />particular case the crown is quite a ways over and fairly near <br />the western edge. The reason for that being that allows us the <br />ability to let the crown of the road work for us instead of <br />against us so that the roadway can get lower and lower as it <br />goes to the south side, again to better match the south side <br />of the road where we certainly recognize there's a difference <br />in elevation. <br /> <br />I will try and give you a feel. This is not the way it is <br />in every foot of the road, but to illustrate what we're trying to <br />do as part of this proposal, the black lines are the proposed <br />road. The red lines are, generally speaking, what's there <br />today. (inaudible) the location of the edge of that asphalt <br />varies from zero to five feet from the proposed edge of the <br />roadway, and it also varies on the south side from two to eight feet, <br />depending on where you are. One of the points I want to make <br />is that, again, the existing roadway generally has a routine <br />crown, slopes down to the north and slopes down to the south. You <br />know there is a difference between the proposed elevation of the <br />road and the existing elevation of the road. It is shown lower, <br />not so that you can see it easier, but so again we can match, <br />especially that south side of the road by having the pavement <br />somewhat lower than it is today. With this approach we feel the side <br />slopes that would be down outside the curbs, these would go up <br />slightly normally and go down on a side slope that almost all of <br />that sloping can be done in the right-of-way rather than getting <br />in the private property. There are a couple instances where it <br />will go slightly beyond that, but most done in the right-of-way <br />rather than in your yards. <br /> <br />There are no retaining walls proposed because we feel we <br />can end up with reasonable slopes in the right-of-way. This <br />does, even though it's in the right-of-way, still result in a <br />number of trees being impacted. There are approximately l7 <br />trees that we feel would not be there if this project goes in. <br />Seventeen trees would have to be removed. Predominantly those <br />are on the south side, although some are on the north as you get <br />closer and closer to Rice Street. <br /> <br />One of the things that we try to do is match into the existing <br />driveways. Where they don't match exactly, the project would <br />include the reconstruction of that portion of the driveway that's <br />impacted. Some of the most severe grades on existing driveways, <br />surprisingly enough in several cases, can actually be improved <br />rather than a detriment so far as this project is concerned. <br />Four of the driveways would improve 4% to 6%. Several others, <br />the best we can do is match them, but we attempted to have it <br />done so we didn't make those severe driveways worse than they <br />are. <br /> <br />Once again, as in the case of the prior project, since it's <br />an H.S.A. road, we wanted to at least explore the possibility of <br />whether there should be a pathway. As most of you know, we have <br />a (inaudible) park here and it extends (inaudible) there is a <br />series of bike paths in the area, one of which comes down Marion. <br />