2011-01-20_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

227 that any additional figures required under the Rule for the new plan should be the responsibility 228 of EOR to provide at no additional expense to the GLWMO Board, as the need for those new 229 required items was foreseeable by EOR when they made their proposal. 230 Mr. Schwartz opined that the situation warranted a discussion with EOR before the Board agreed 231 to pay additional costs. Mr. Schwartz further opined that, as part EOR's RFP submission, they 232 should have understood the documents required under MN Rule 8410.0170. 233 234 Mr. Petersen concurred with Mr. Schwartz. Mr. Petersen questioned if the City of Roseville had 235 the staff resources to provide the work in -house at a lower rate than EOR. 236 Mr. Schwartz advised that he was not willing to commit to preparing or providing any additional 237 documents beyond those already included in available databases. 238 Chair Pro -tem Eckman clarified and reiterated that the GLWMO was responsible for BWSR- 239 required figures that had been included in the Second Generation Plan. 240 Mr. Schwartz concurred with Chair Pro -tem Eckman, noting that was what EOR proposed in 241 their proposal, as discussed with EOR and GLWMO Board assumptions during the interview 242 process and review of their RFP. 243 Chair Pro -tem Eckman clarified that EOR was responsible for figures required for the Third 244 Generation Plan that had not been a part of the requirements for the Second Generation Plan. 245 Mr. Schwartz and Mr. Petersen concurred that this was the conversation that was needed with 246 EOR. 247 Mr. Schwartz opined that it was the Board's assumption that the available data and spreadsheets 248 from the Second Generation Plan would be provided to EOR for their incorporation into the 249 Third Generation Plan, and that the EOR RFP indicated that they would take care of the 250 additional documentation. 251 Figures Discussion continues: 252 Additional discussion included BWSR rules if they transcended 2001; portions of Figure 12 253 (Open Space Recreation Areas) available from the City of Roseville, but not including boat 254 access information unless the Parks and Recreation Department had access to that information, 255 with Mr. Schwartz advising that he would research whether that information was available, but 256 that at this time, he was unwilling to commit to any additional data that needed to be obtained 257 from other agencies, only those items available internally. Mr. Schwartz advised that if 258 additional information was available internally (e.g. Figure 12) he would submit it to the Board, 259 with similar information possibly also available from the City of Shoreview. 260 261 Further discussion included that information from each representative City could be incorporated 262 into one figure, which may reduce the actual number of figures needed by EOR. 263 264 Chair Pro -tem Eckman opined that the remaining 8 figures not to be addressed by the cities 265 needed to be reviewed to determine those included in the Second Generation Plan and those that 266 were not included. She suggested that, as a subcommittee, she and Member Von De Linde, do 267 this review and ask EOR for a specific proposal to recreate and update the figures contained in 268 the 2 Generation Plan that the GLWMO is responsible for. 269 Additional discussion included knowledge of actual costs and any alternatives before committing 270 to the additional work; potential software formatting considerations for digital information; 271 existence of a wetland inventory for the City of Shoreview, but not for the City of Roseville; and 6