res_7094 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

not anticipate any problem with those trees. This time there are no fences we know of that are out in the right-of-way so that will be no problem. Again, most of the driveways are concrete. Any drives that we do not match properly, we would be cutting that back or going to the property line or wherever the most appropriate joint in that concrete would be and re- constructing that driveway as a part of the improvement. The design on the road itself would again be in the middle of the 60 foot right-of-way, 32 feet from face of curb to face of curb, with an asphalt surface, so-called residential or seven ton design, and the more or less standard straight up and down, at least what most people think of as straight up and down curb. Again, quite similar to the other project. In this particular case, the south side of the road has mostly side lots. Here are a whole series. of lots on the south side that the 10% side lot rule that I spoke of on the past project would apply as well. So if your long side is along Brenner, then the assessment would be 1/10 of the distance. Depending on how long your lot is, that's how many assessable feet you would end up with. Using the 130 foot example we had on the past one, that would end up with 13 assessable feet for those particular lots because it's side lot. MR. POPOVICH: Mayor and members of the Council, the pub- lished cost of this improvement is $113,522.10. Together with the previous improvement, both streets together total the $243,580.49 figure that I had given. On the combined basis, therefore, and based at a rate of 25% being assessed and the rest carried by general taxes or M.S.A. funds, the assessment rate would be $13.80 a front foot for this street, as well as the street just to the north. MAYOR DEMOS: Are there any written statements? MR. ANDRE: There are none. ~ffiYOR DEMOS: Again I will open the hearing to the public and ask that you come to the microphone, give your name and address and the address of the property to which you are referring. MR. LEO BOHANON, 1415 Brenner: Since this is a major outlet for the sewer line coming down, the storm sewer system, the street has to be torn up and I think there were some pro- visions in there for paving, the cost, should this have reduced the overall cost of the street? MR. HONCHELL: The storm sewer is being presented, what was presented, on the basis of being able to stand alone by itself. There's no way for us to presume whether this paving improvement that's under consideration now will be approved or whether it will be rejected. We therefore put enough money into the estimate of the storm sewer project that if the sewer wasn't done, the (inaudible) we could, of course, 2