My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7095
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7000
>
res_7095
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:49 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:05:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7095
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-ST-80-20 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
1/26/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MAYOR DEMOS: You weren't the only one. <br /> <br />MR. WALTER RIHM: All I know is our attorney said abso- <br />lutely not. We said we're going to fight it. Unfortunately he <br />is tied up tonight. But I'm not a fighting guy. I'm too fat <br />to fight and I can't run. I try to be congenial. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I don't think I've called this hearing to a <br />close. Is there anyone who wishes to speak on the subject before <br />I close it? Alright, I'll close the hearing. Now we'll proceed <br />with our questions. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: I find it a very <br />I can't help but feel that that amount of <br />amount of money to expect anybody to pay. <br />figure it all out myself. (Inaudible) . <br /> <br />complicated situation. <br />money is a terrific <br />I'm not sure I can <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: (Inaudible). I guess the thing that this <br />Council has to determine, the way I've resolved it with myself <br />in the last few nights is whether or not we want to, and I'm <br />going to use the word "force", Mr. Rihm into subdividing his <br />property into smaller parcels, or whether we wish to allow him to <br />keep it in its present intended use. I think that's the decision <br />we have to make before we take a vote. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: You're forcing him to subdivide his <br />lots, you're saying that we should go with the whole thing? <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: If you want to let him have his present in- <br />tended use, then I would suggest that we go with the water and <br />storm sewer. And like I said, I don't think we have any choice <br />on the storm sewer, considering we're putting it in to St. <br />Anthony, and I really don't think we have a choice on the water <br />because I think it's to all our advantages to have those mains <br />looped. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: <br />Williams Pipeline. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: It's going to cost them and it's going to <br />cost them more money this way than it would the other way and <br />it's going to cost M & M more money, but it does not cost Rihm <br />or Marabella or the other owner. <br /> <br />(Inaudible) who pays the most for that? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: Just M & M and the pi~eline. The water <br />we have to have to protect our city. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I guess I'll go out on a limb and make that <br />recommendation if that's what the Council wants. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: We eliminate the road then. <br /> <br />MR. WALTER RIHM: May I ask a question? I certainly <br />wouldn't pin you down to it, but can we take these ballpark <br />figures that have been. batted around as reasonably correct? <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.