My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0613
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 9:45:19 AM
Creation date
6/21/2011 9:45:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/13/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 13, 2011 <br /> Page 12 <br /> years. Councilmember Johnson noted that a lot had to do with the City Council's <br /> strategy from a business standpoint in managing that deficit. Councilmember <br /> Johnson advised that input from the Commission on items such as whether the <br /> current practice for paving streets needed to be continued, or if dropping down a <br /> level or deferring that reconstruction was financially advantageous or would have <br /> a downside and the current schedule continued. Councilmember Johnson re- <br /> quested that type of study by the Commission to help the City Council get a better <br /> handle on practical cuts or overall, long-term cost savings by more frequent re- <br /> construction and/or maintenance; or where assets were maximized out. In dealing <br /> with the CIP assets, Councilmember Johnson advised that there was nothing on <br /> their list that didn't somehow involve the PWET Commission; and welcomed in- <br /> put from and a close working relationship with the Commission to maximize the <br /> CIP Plan and make a bold effort to get that back on track. <br /> Mayor Roe spoke in support of the track being undertaken by the Commission on <br /> asset management techniques and from a CIP perspective, how to manage streets <br /> and other City infrastructure; in addition to review of the current Assessment Pol- <br /> icy. <br /> Councilmember Willmus echoed comments of his colleagues; and supported the <br /> work that the Commission was undertaking for organized solid waste collection <br /> and determining the real impacts, and other studies that will provide guidance to <br /> the City. Councilmember Willmus advised that he looked forward to hearing the <br /> PWET Commission discussion and their future recommendations. <br /> Councilmember Pust opined that any members of the public listening to this dis- <br /> cussion, would be impressed with the level of review performed by the PWET <br /> Commission, and asked the Chair for their meeting schedule for public informa- <br /> tion. <br /> Chair DeBenedet noted that the PWET Commission met the fourth Tuesday of <br /> each month in the City Hall Council chambers at 6:30 p.m. <br /> Mayor Roe noted tonight's discussion as an example of the rationale for and value <br /> of volunteer advisory commissions to assist the City Council; and expressed his <br /> personal appreciation for their time and input. Mayor Roe reiterated that those <br /> items listed by the PWET Commission as topics for their 2011/2012 work plan <br /> were right on track and in line with the City Council's own work plan and areas of <br /> concern. <br /> At the request of Member Stenlund on anything else on the City Council's radar <br /> that the PWET Commission should be aware of, Mayor Roe opined that the <br /> Neighborhood Traffic Management Policy review was a very high priority. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.