Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 13, 2011 <br /> Page 6 <br /> City Manager Malinen and Mayor Roe volunteered to review their records on this <br /> issue and the original grant award to respond about matching City funds. <br /> Johnson moved, Pust seconded, acceptance of the Office of Traffic Safety Grant <br /> award of one (1) Panasonic Arbitrator 360 in-squad camera; as detailed in At- <br /> tachment A and total costs detailed in Attachment B. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Johnson; Pust; Willmus; McGehee; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> 8. Consider Items Removed from Consent <br /> 9. General Ordinances for Adoption <br /> a. Consider an Ordinance Adding Chapter 410 Title Four of the Roseville City <br /> Code Regulating the Use of Coal Tar Based Sealer Products <br /> Public Works Director Duane Schwartz briefly summarized this item as detailed <br /> in the RCA dated June 13, 2011; and as introduced in a previous Council meeting <br /> and receiving enthusiastic support of the City Council. Mr. Schwartz advised that <br /> this would be more of an educational, rather than enforcement, item; and was <br /> strongly supported and recommended by the City's Public Works, Environment, <br /> and Transportation Commission(PWET). <br /> Pust moved, Johnson seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1409 (Attachment <br /> A) entitled, "An Ordinance Adding Chapter 410 to Title Four of the Roseville <br /> City Code Regulating the Use of Coal Tar-Based Sealer Products within the City <br /> of Roseville, MN, as amended — lines 58 — 70;" and enactment of Ordinance <br /> Summary No. 1409 (Attachment B) entitled, "Summary of An Ordinance Amend- <br /> ing Title Four, Adding Chapter 410, Coal Tar Sealants" <br /> Mayor Roe noted that an Ordinance Summary for publication requires a super- <br /> majority vote. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned why the City didn't prohibit sale of coal-tar <br /> products in the City of Roseville, rather than having a long, involved process for <br /> people to get a permit. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that such a prohibition would be difficult for staff to en- <br /> force, as the product was not generally available for sale any longer over the <br /> counter; but the product was still used by door-to-door vendors buying directly <br /> from their distributors. Mr. Schwartz advised that this determination was based <br /> on research done by other cities as well as Roseville. <br />