My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7328
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7300
>
res_7328
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:15:54 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:11:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7328
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-82-5 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Ordering Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor
Resolution Date Passed
3/8/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COUNCILY~ KERR: That's why I wanted that knoll cut out of <br />there and moved up towards Victoria, since you're going to <br />excavate there anyway, for that holding pond. Then you might <br />just as well cut that knoll out and move it up. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Moving this little knob out toward the <br />Victoria side is not a major cost. <br /> <br />V~YOR DEMOS: I will now open the hearing for the recon- <br />struction of Aglen Street from Transit Avenue to Brooks Avenue - <br />P-82-5. Are there any written statements? <br /> <br />}ffi. NORTH: The only one that we would have would be the <br />one that was submitted here by the gentleman from Barbara and <br />Richard St. Dennis indicating that they support the project. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: The cost of this project is $38,472.19 and <br />there are 1,l03.41 assessable front feet. If you divided the <br />two figures it comes out to $34.87 per foot - 25% of that is <br />$8.72, which you multiply by the width of your lot. I would <br />recommend that this be spread over that same ten year period <br />that you have with the other projects. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I might say, regarding the statement in that <br />letter where they would hold the right to withdraw their support <br />should the cost increase - if the costs come in in excess of <br />25% over the estimate, then we have to hold another hearing. <br />We already have four people that have spoken for the paving of <br />'Aglen - anyone else who wishes to speak on the repaving of <br />Aglen? <br /> <br />MR. CARL ANDERSON, 917 Transit Avenue: I favor it, but <br />while I don't live on the street, I feel it would be an improve- <br />ment to the neighborhood. I want to address another question <br />to Mr. Honchell - some of the neighbors in the neighborhood - <br />there on Chatsworth - I talked to some on Chatsworth - and <br />they wish to petition for a street improvement at this time. <br />Would it be more eCQnomical, if they would petition at this <br />time, to include it with the same project? Would it be to <br />their advantage? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: well, the larger within reason that the <br />ultimate contract is, generally the cheaper it is for all <br />pieces by scale, although it's not giant-or noti~eable - it <br />is minor, but. it's there. As far as the petitions - if anybody <br />on these streets wishes to have their road done at the same <br />time - the process would be to contact the engineering staff, <br />who would give them a petition and a little booklet as to ,how <br />petitions are circulated, how hearings are held - although <br />everybody in the neighborhood is probably an expert now - <br />offer to meet with them at a neighborhood meeting or up here <br />qt the City Hall if their neighbors want to to help explain <br />it like we did on Aglen. If they want to, they could also <br />get it done at the same time and the same contract as long as <br />this happened relatively soon - within the next few weeks. <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.