My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7388
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7300
>
res_7388
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:16:38 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:13:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7388
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-82-17 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Ordering Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor
Resolution Date Passed
8/9/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The proposed facility is to look to the anticipated future <br />of this area and provide not just another three-ton road with <br />curb and gutter, but a roadway facility that will meet the <br />anticipated 3,000 cars per day that the traffic experts predict <br />for this area. The proposal is for a nine-ton roadway that <br />would be 36 feet wide that would accommodate the increase in <br />volume and also the heavier vehicles that are anticipated to be <br />on the road. As you may recall, the Hoffmann development has <br />its primary access for its trucks off the Fulham Street front- <br />age. If this proposal is not approved, then it will be <br />necessary to - in my opinion - review that development plan <br />because there will not be very good circulation for this south- <br />easterly corner. <br /> <br />The construction will require relocation of some fire <br />hydrants. It will also require the construction of a small <br />piece of storm sewer part way up the block to intercept the flows <br />as they corne southerly. It will impact a cluster of trees in <br />the extreme southwestern corner, although the sloping in that <br />area will be able to hopefully save several of them. It's not <br />anticipated that it will be taking any of the trees along the <br />west side. However, with the widening, there is a series of <br />trees on the northern portion of the roadway on the east side <br />which will have to be removed. Fortunately, as that land <br />slopes up toward the warehouse facilities, there are numerous <br />other smaller trees already in existence which can be retained <br />and provide screening to the warehousing. <br /> <br />This project - to some degree - is tied to the storm sewer <br />which will be discussed shortly, but essentially can be decided <br />on its own merits either way. As many of you know, the City is <br />currently considering the possibility of tax increment financing. <br />How all of this project will ultimately be funded is still un- <br />resolved and whether the City will indeed have tax increment <br />financing is also unresolved, but it is one of the points of <br />consideration at least as to possible funding. Mr. Popovich <br />,will be presenting the numbers involved in this project. <br /> <br />Perhaps to help some of you as to how the City assesses <br />streets, I might review some of our typical special assessment <br />policy procedures. For instance, tonight's hearing is for <br />deciding whether the road would be done or not and after the <br />construction was completed there would be a second hearing that <br />would take up how it would be funded - who would pay how much <br />and where the various funds would come from. The City also has <br />been following as policy a practice of giving corner lot re- <br />ductions where frontage is involved and there are several of <br />those involved in this particular roadway. On that policy, <br />only 10% of the cost - 10% of the footage rather - is considered <br />for assessment for the first 150 feet. Any depths beyond that <br />are then normal assessments. It's also been the practice of <br />the City to assess only 25% of the actual cost when a property <br />is zoned R-l - or single-family. That's what would prevail in <br />the current case of the three most northerly homes and the <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.