My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7388
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7300
>
res_7388
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:16:38 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:13:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7388
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-82-17 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Ordering Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor
Resolution Date Passed
8/9/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />property nearest Terminal on the west side of the street. The <br />remaining parcels are zoned business or industrial and would <br />typically have the full assessment applied to them <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Mayor and members of the Council, the esti- <br />mated cost of this project is $155,000.00. The business and <br />industrial footage is 985 feet and the R-l footage is 410 feet. <br />By taking the estimated cost and determining 100% against the <br />business and industrial, that would come out to $111.11 per foot, <br />which would raise approximately $109,335.00. The residential <br />portion of 410 feet, at the 25% front foot cost, would come out <br />to roughly $28.00, and that would raise $11,588.00, for a total <br />of $120,923.00 to be raised by assessments. The difference <br />between that and the $155,000.00 would be picked up as the <br />City's share on general taxes or by the tax increment bonds or <br />project that is later being considered. <br /> <br />We would recommend that the assessments be spread over a <br />period not to exceed 15 years at the maximum interest rate pro- <br />vided at that time and, of course, the exact cost would be <br />known at the time of the assessment hearing. <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: There are no written communications. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I will open this hearing to the public and <br />ask that each person come to the microphone, give his or her <br />name and the address of the property to which you are referring. <br /> <br />MR. CLIFFORD LUND, 2241 North Milton: I represent Roberts <br />Construction. We own the property - the industrial property <br />facing Terminal Road on the east side of Fulham, which is <br />approximately 487 feet of frontage along Fulham. Based on what <br />Mr. Popovich has said, we're faced with a $50,000 assessment <br />for something we don't need. We wish to oppose it. (Mr. Lund <br />also presented a letter to this effect to the Council.) <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Anyone else? <br /> <br />GLORIA THAYER, 2351 Fulham Street: I am B-4 - the one <br />house on the street that's zoned B-4 - and I guess at this <br />point 11m opposed until at some time when I know, or have some <br />idea of what it's going to cost me. I don't particularly care <br />for a finished road over there. I like it, it's a country <br />atmosphere, and I've enjoyed it for 20 some years and I still <br />like it. They can have it on the other side of the street <br />where Hoffmann Electric is coming in. They can finish it in <br />their area. They have done it the same way with (inaudible). <br />It's been quite satisfactory. When they talk in terms - I <br />missed the last meeting when the rezoning was done - and they <br />said that at some point in time we will all have to move, but <br />the property has not been bought at this time and we are still <br />residents there. If the petition - and I don't know if this is <br />out of order or not - but if it should be approved, then I will <br />have to make a petition that mine is residential because it's <br />being used as residential. It is not a business. Thank you. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.